According to the question about the high cost of train control and passengers safety, it is necessary to notice that if the administration aims to put the money into separate searches, with the same result, they could invest in the anchors of ECP. Thus, “order years of new research to confirm the safety benefits of ECP brakes”. In my opinion, all railway organizations have to implement every available and modern technology in the current practice. Apart from gaining, each company has to provide their clients with the complete safety. Refunding financial expenses to sustain life is the moral obligation that any railway organization has to implement.Due to the question concerning the money spent to regulate railroad safety, I think that the railways, oil-processing plants, and shareholder base can probably more efficiently cover the expenses of the ECP anchors installation. Furthermore, the typical employee paying dues raised to defray for months of unproductive search. Therefore, I do not define the money spent on the unavailing study as a sufficient way to decrease the risks of deaths and injuries in a community.
Usually, it is necessary to take responsibility for people’s failures to effect significant changes. One of the variant to draw society’s attention is having the humans influenced by Metrolink talk to the mass media or a group of people. Observation over affected people could force the firm to move faster. Thus, if I had been a lobbyist wishing to influence safety legislation after the crash, my strategy would have been to engage as much as possible people who were impacted by railway incidents in the presence of the legislative authority or written applications. This situation requires to be intimate not about the monetary objects; however, the administration and railway agencies turn it the only problem. They should consider that human lives were missed and people were injured, involving their physical, emotional, and mental states. Any quantity of money cannot change events occurred.